<$BlogRSDUrl$>

How secure are unique biological processes under the traditional systems of reserves, where use limits are applied and changed to address the unique threats in an area. Lock up and lock out appears to be is a simple way to avoid long term environmental impact and increase biodiversity, but does it work? Experienced ecosystems observers say interference is " not all bad", sighting some of our oldest National Parks where biodiversity has decreased because of closure. Management and use is not all

Thursday, February 05, 2004

The lack of trust is a severe impediment to the integrity of the conservation movement . After all. which government or person or insititution should we trust to manage land in perpetuity--let alone next week
The object of trust keeps changing , which means whom should we trust to advise us whom we should trust ?
We don't trust the Feds over Pt Napean , why trust the State? They have no money to manage-- only money to write policy!
The non trustees are so non trusting they want up lock things up so the potentail users ( and payers ) can't get near them ? Unless you happen to be one of them ?- a walker
Why should we trust the walkers ? another NIMBY issue where we are asked to trust independant planning advice from one set of neighbours who want their current neighborhood to not change.

Clearly the government leaders are not helping themselves by allowing the role of independant planning advisors to run down and allowing the nimbys to run riot .see

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?